I am trying to recall when was the last time 
another government resorted to ridiculous lying to its own people, why, 
and what as the consequences. 
 
 The situation would be 
much worse if such a government had to hope to rely on their repeated or
 amended lies, one after another, following the needs to retreat in the 
face of evidences contradicting to their lies.  But the lies keep 
on coming out of the sitting high authorities, through the state media.
 
 
 
 If that wasn't Thailand, nor the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution era China, where else could that be.  why?
 
 
 
 Just to illustrate a few, here they are:
 
 
 
 1)
  Regarding the existence and roles of the "black clothed men" 
during the December 26 incidents at Thai-Japanese Stadium in Ding Daeng
 
 
 
 Reports
 from the field by the media first indicated a cop and a protester were 
fatally shot by live-bullets along with 171 injured, many of them, 
including many policemen, by live bullets.
 
 
 
 The issue:  Where did those live bullets come from, whose guns?  
 
 The
 police: None of the 1800-2000 policemen dispatched to the site carried 
any guns or live bullets.  This is lie number one.
 
 
 
 This
 lie by police chief and the police spokesman was cracked almost 
instantly when international journalists and people at the site showed 
hundreds of photographs of police firing various types of guns and 
tossing grenades at protesters.
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 2.  "Black clothed men" brought in to instigate angers and worsen violence
 
 
 
 The
 issue:  Did the black clothed men exist?  Were they Thai 
policemen? Why were they there?  Why did they had to attire in 
black rather than their regular police uniform?
 
 
 
 Thai police:  Nobody saw any black clothed men
 
 
 
 Thai
 police had to concede to the existence of the black clothed men on the 
rooftop only after the photographs taken by some foreign photographers 
were shared in the facebook and in the world media.
 
 
 
 Thai police:  If black clothed men existed, they were part of the protesters, brought in to kill the police.
 
 
 
 The
 Government's security adviser, Chalerm Yoobamlung:  The black 
clothed men were the protesters brought up to the Labor's Ministry's 
rooftop by helicopters.
 
 
 
 Later, Thai police 
chief:  Yes, the black clothed men existed at the site, there were 
only 10 of them, they were there to observe the situation and to fire 
tear gas, they were unarmed otherwise.
 
 
 
 Late, 
Thai police spokesman, showing mis-scaled 3-dimension maps:  The 
police attired in black on the rooftop were had no angles to fire at the
 killed persons.  (But he shrunken his illustration to conceal the 
actual distance of over 100 m between the buildings.
 
 
 
 Most
 of the hundreds of journalists and photographers in the areas were 
positioned on the side of the protesters as they were not allow accesses
 on the police's side.  However, there had been absolutely no 
reports of the sighting of any protesters carrying or using any kind of 
guns at all.
 
 
 
 From all evidence collected, 
considering the motivation, capacity and opportunities to commit the 
crime of shooting the policemen and the protesters with live ammunition,
 I can only conclude that, since there has been no reports or proofs 
from any sources whatsoever that any protesters carried or used any guns
 on that day at that site while ample evidence showed Thai policemen and
 the black clothed men carried and used guns and had live ammunition 
delivered and stored at the site, it is only reasonable to say that only
 the policemen and the black clothed men can be the persons who fired at
 both the policemen and the protesters.
 
 
 
 Since 
the black clothed men did exist and were positioned in the vantage point
 on the rooftop and were mixed in among the policemen when brutal 
assaults were carried out against the people.  And, along with the 
later admission by police spokesman and police chief, it proves that the
 black clothed men was brought in by the police with the intention to 
gain advantages for their campaigns against the protesters.   There
 had, thus far been no reasonable explanation as to the reason that the 
black clothed men should attire in black, if they were regular Thai 
policemen carrying out normal police duties.  It goes to the weight
 of proving the ill intents of the police or Thai government in bringing
 in these black clothed men.
 
 
 
 Considering Thai 
police leadership's past records, it is very convincing that they have 
brought in the black clothed killers to fire at Thai police to create 
angers among Thai police, while at the same time force the police, who 
might fear of being shot by the black clothed men, to do as the police 
boss and the government ordered, that is to terrorize the protesters 
with deaths and injuries.
 
 
 
 In my brief review of
 history, only the very damned corrupted, sinister government could have
 come up with such dirty tricks and still trying to depend on such 
terrrible lies.